Skip to main content
Professional background
Biography image

William E.Manske

Partnermoc.eniHnospmohT@eksnaM.mailliW
Minneapolis

O 612.605.5903

William E.Manske

Partner

Focus Areas

Examples of Will’s experience include:

Trade Secret

  • Covidien v. Esch — Served as trial counsel for a healthcare company in a trade secret and breach of contract case against a former employee. Following trial in the federal court for the District of Massachusetts, the jury found in the client’s favor on claims for breach of contract stemming from disclosure and use of confidential information to establish a competing business.
  • IWCO Direct Holdings Inc. v. Nahan Printing, Inc. — Represented a leading provider of direct marketing services in a trade secret suit against former executives and their new employer. Case settled on confidential terms after a hearing on cross-motions for summary judgment.
  • Virtual Radiologic Corp. v. Tandem — Represented plaintiffs Virtual Radiologic Corporation and Nighthawk Radiology Services in patent infringement, copyright, and trade secret action relating to radiologic viewing technology. Obtained permanent injunctions in favor of clients, including a finding of patent infringement.

Trademark

  • National Presto Industries v. U.S. Merchants — Served as trial counsel for U.S. Merchants in successful defense of trade dress infringement claims brought by National Presto Industries. Also served as appellate counsel in successful defense of trial verdict before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Patent

  • Club Car v. Yamaha — Represented Club Car, a manufacturer of utility vehicles, in a patent case involving GPS technology used to manage and control vehicle usage on golf courses. After defeating four inter partes review (IPR) challenges, the case settled confidentially, and Yamaha modified its accused product offering.
  • MTD Products Co. v. The Toro Company — Represented defendant Toro, a manufacturer of outdoor power equipment, in a multi-patent dispute involving transmission technology for zero-turn-radius vehicles. The case settled on confidential terms after the Patent Trial and Appeal Board invalidated two of the asserted patents following successful inter partes review (IPR) challenges, and the plaintiff withdrew its preliminary injunction motion after reexamination challenges were initiated on the third patent.
  • Genovis AB v. Promega — Defended biotechnology company Genovis AB in a patent infringement suit in the Western District of Wisconsin involving protease sequencing technology. The case settled on confidential terms after filing of summary judgment motions.

Counseling & Transactions

  • Stevenson v. WWE — Advised on a groundbreaking Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deal between a U.S. Olympian wrestler and World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. (WWE) — the first of its kind for WWE.
  • IP Counseling and Due Diligence in M&A — Regularly advises buyers, sellers, investors, and corporate development teams on IP issues in M&A transactions, including patent portfolio assessments, trade secret exposure analysis, software IP ownership reviews, and representation and warranty issues.

 

  • The Patent Practitioner’s New Playbook: Key Developments in Venue Issues, Global Litigation, and PTAB Strategy,” Thompson Hine Webinar, March 2026
  • Panelist, “Strategy Considerations to Maximize Value in IP Transactions,” IP Leadership Executive Summit, San Jose, California, April 24, 2024
  • Panelist, “Unlocking the Enigma: Generative AI, Regulatory IP Concerns and Views from the In-House,” Global IP Strategy Hub, Minneapolis, Minnesota, January 30, 2024
  • Panelist, “Ethics Check-In: USPTO Insight and Practical Implications of AI,” Connecticut Bar Association, Intellectual Property Section, Hartford, CT, December 12, 2023
  • Panelist, “Digital Disruption: How to Protect Your Brands in a Virtual World,” Managing IP’s Intellectual Property and Innovation Summit, New York, May 24, 2022
  • Listed as a Recommended Lawyer in Legal 500 City Elite – Minneapolis for Commercial Disputes and Intellectual Property, 2026
  • Named to the 2026 Lawdragon 500 X – The Next Generation list, IP & Technology Litigation
  • International Asset Management’s IAM Patent 1000, 2026
  • Selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® 2025-2026 for Litigation-Intellectual Property and Litigation-Patent
  • World Trademark Review 1000 – The World’s Leading Trademark Professionals, 2023-2026
  • Selected to the Minnesota Rising Stars list, 2016-2025
  • Named a North Star Lawyer by the Minnesota State Bar Association for providing at least 50 hours of pro bono legal services, 2016, 2024

Professional Associations

  • Minnesota State Bar Association
  • Federal Bar Association

Community Activities

  • The Advocates for Human Rights, Board Member

Education

  • University of Minnesota Law School, J.D.,
    cum laude
  • George Washington University, B.A.,
    cum laude

Bar Admissions

  • Minnesota

Court Admissions

  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois