Doori is a senior managing associate in the Business Litigation group. He focuses on complex commercial litigation and class actions, representing clients in state and federal courts. His experience encompasses matters involving product liability, breach of contract, consumer disputes, fraud, and unjust enrichment.
Doori was an associate at Thompson Hine for two years after graduating from law school. Before rejoining the firm in January 2026, he was an associate with two Am Law 100 firms and served as a judicial law clerk for Judge Anthony W. Ishii of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. While attending law school, Doori was a judicial extern for Judge Thomas M. Rose of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.
Focus Areas
Examples of Doori’s experience include:
- Defending several Fortune 100 companies in class actions asserting violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Consumers Legal Remedies Act, and False Advertising Law.
- Obtaining dismissal and/or summary judgment of multimillion-dollar claims in state and federal courts.
- Defending several global retail companies in arbitration and arbitration appeals.
- Advising multiple international entertainment companies in connection with new and forthcoming statutes and regulations.
- Conducting and defending depositions on behalf of several global product manufacturers.
- Defending banks and pursuing claims in connection with various forms of bank fraud and lender liability claims.
- Appearing in court on behalf of several multinational companies.
- “Supreme Court Narrows TCPA Definition of ATDS,” Thompson Hine Business Litigation Update, April 2021
- “Ohio District Court Agrees that TCPA Was Unconstitutional from 2015 to 2020,” Thompson Hine Business Litigation Update, November 2020
- “Louisiana Federal Court Holds that TCPA Was Unconstitutional from 2015 to 2020,” Thompson Hine Business Litigation Update, October 2020
- “Second Circuit Takes Expansive Approach on the Definition of an ATDS,” The Journal of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Law, September-October 2020
- “Sixth Circuit Agrees with Second and Ninth Circuits’ Definition of ATDS,” Thompson Hine Business Litigation Update, August 2020
- “TCPA Lives to See Another Day as Supreme Court Severs the Government-Debt Exception,” Thompson Hine Business Litigation Update, July 2020
- “Ninth Circuit Agrees With the Seventh and Eleventh Circuits in Holding That Consent From the Intended Recipient of a Call Is Not Sufficient to Avoid TCPA Liability,” Thompson Hine Business Litigation Update, June 2020
- “Eleventh Circuit Agrees With Second Circuit That Individuals Cannot Revoke Bargained-For Consent Under the TCPA,” Thompson Hine Business Litigation Update, May 2020
- “Second Circuit Takes Expansive Approach on the Definition of an ATDS,” Thompson Hine Business Litigation Update, April 2020
- “U.S. Corporate Liability Under the Alien Tort Statute After Jesner v. Arab Bank,” PLC, 21 Or. Rev. Int’l L. 1, 2020
- “Judicial Pragmatism: Strengths and Weaknesses in Common Law Adjudication, Legislative Interpretation, and Constitutional Interpretation,” 52 J. Marshall L. Rev. 369, 2019
- “Judicial Approaches to Political Questions: A Comparative Study of the United States and South Korea,” 19 Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 234, 2019
- “Qualified Immunity and the Clear, But Unclear First Amendment Right to Film Police,” 33 Notre Dame J. L. Ethics & Pub. Pol’y 337, 2019
- “Blackhorse’s Last Stand?: The First Amendment Battle Against the Washington ‘Redskins’ Trademark After Matal v. Tam,” 19 Wake Forest J. Bus. & Intell. Prop. L. 173, 2019
- “Restoring Mutuality in Sports Contracts,” 9 Ariz. St. Sports & Ent. L.J. 49, 2019
- Ladas Memorial Award, Student Paper Category, International Trademark Association, 2019
- Best Brief Award, Seigenthaler-Sutherland Cup National Moot Court Competition, 2018
Education
- University of Notre Dame Law School, J.D.,
Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, articles editor; Moot Court Board, executive officer
- Columbia University, M.A.
- Seoul National University, M.A.
- Princeton University, A.B.
Bar Admissions
- California
- Ohio
Court Admissions
- U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Languages
- Korean
- Supreme Court Narrows TCPA Definition of ATDS,
Business Litigation Update
, April 6, 2021 - Ohio District Court Agrees that TCPA Was Unconstitutional from 2015 to 2020,
Business Litigation Update
, November 5, 2020 - Louisiana Federal Court Holds that TCPA Was Unconstitutional from 2015 to 2020,
Business Litigation Update
, October 12, 2020 - Sixth Circuit Agrees with Second and Ninth Circuits’ Definition of ATDS,
Business Litigation Update
, August 4, 2020 - TCPA Lives to See Another Day as Supreme Court Severs the Government-Debt Exception,
Business Litigation Update
, July 8, 2020 - Ninth Circuit Agrees With Seventh and Eleventh Circuits Holds That Consent From Intended Call Recipient Is Not Sufficient to Avoid TCPA Liability,
Business Litigation Update
, June 9, 2020 - Eleventh Circuit Agrees With Second Circuit That Individuals Cannot Revoke Bargained-For Consent Under the TCPA,
Business Litigation Update
, May 11, 2020 - Second Circuit Takes Expansive Approach on the Definition of an ATDS,
Business Litigation Update
, April 14, 2020