Careers

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Experience

Innovation

Interactive Maps

Locations

About

Pages

Meet our team of innovators
Ask us how we do it

Professionals

Insights

Services

Thompson Hine LLP, a full-service business law firm with approximately 400 lawyers in 11 offices, was ranked number 1 in the category “Most innovative North American law firms: New working models” by The Financial Times and was 1 of 7 firms shortlisted for The American Lawyer’s inaugural Legal Services Innovation Award. The firm has been recognized by the National Law Journal as a Legal Technology Trailblazer and featured by Bloomberg for its innovative service delivery models, which drive accuracy and predictability. The firm’s commitment to innovation is embodied in Thompson Hine SmartPaTHTM – a smarter way to work – predictable, efficient and aligned with client goals. For more information, please visit ThompsonHine.com and ThompsonHine.com/SmartPaTH.

Home | Thompson Hine LLP

Atlanta

Chicago

Cincinnati

Cleveland

Columbus

Dayton

Los Angeles

Minneapolis

New York

Silicon Valley

Washington, D.C.

Thompson Hine LLP is pleased to announce a significant victory for several clients in the U.S. International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-1410, <em>In the Matter of Certain Disposable Vaporizer Devices</em>. On March 10, the Commission issued an opinion reversing an Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) finding of a Section 337 violation, finding that the remaining asserted claims of complainant RJ Reynolds’ patent were obvious and therefore invalid and terminating the investigation with a finding of no violation. This outcome allows the firm’s clients to continue to sell their electronic vaporizer products, free of the threat of exclusion orders, cease-and-desist orders, and bond obligations that had been recommended by the ALJ.

contentpilot/introduction

The investigation, instituted in July 2024 against 18 participating respondents, proceeded at a demanding pace across two full trial phases – a temporary exclusion order proceeding and a permanent phase – culminating in a weeklong evidentiary hearing in April 2025. The investigation involved complex patent law and international trade law issues, including claim construction, multiple theories of invalidity, non-infringement, and domestic industry.

core/paragraph

The team of Thompson Hine attorneys included Eric Heyer, Joe Smith, Marla Butler (who served as lead trial counsel for Thompson Hine’s clients), Andy Himebaugh, Zach Page, and Clint King and worked closely with counsel from multiple other law firms in a joint defense group (JDG). After the ALJ found a violation despite the JDG’s success in invalidating all but two asserted claims, the team successfully petitioned the Commission for review and employed innovative, well-reasoned arguments based on the evidentiary record to secure a full reversal.

The firm’s success in this 1410 investigation showcases Thompson Hine’s adaptability to this important forum, its interdisciplinary expertise in patent law, litigation, and international trade law, and its remarkable ability to collaborate and succeed alongside other top-flight legal practitioners.

Partner

Marla R. Butler

Eric N. Heyer

Joe Smith

Associate

Andy Himebaugh

Zachary T. Page

Senior Managing Associate

Clint King

Intellectual Property (IP) & Technology Litigation

Intellectual Property (IP) Prosecution, Transactions & Portfolio Management

International Trade

Business Litigation

Thompson Hine Vital in Securing No Violation Holding in Patent Litigation at International Trade Commission