Careers

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Experience

Innovation

Interactive Maps

Locations

About

Pages

Meet our team of innovators
Ask us how we do it

Professionals

Insights

Services

Thompson Hine LLP, a full-service business law firm with approximately 400 lawyers in 8 offices, was ranked number 1 in the category “Most innovative North American law firms: New working models” by The Financial Times and was 1 of 7 firms shortlisted for The American Lawyer’s inaugural Legal Services Innovation Award. The firm has been recognized by the National Law Journal as a Legal Technology Trailblazer and featured by Bloomberg for its innovative service delivery models, which drive accuracy and predictability. The firm’s commitment to innovation is embodied in Thompson Hine SmartPaTHTM – a smarter way to work – predictable, efficient and aligned with client goals. For more information, please visit ThompsonHine.com and ThompsonHine.com/SmartPaTH.

Home | Thompson Hine LLP

Atlanta

Chicago

Cincinnati

Cleveland

Columbus

Dayton

New York

Washington, D.C.

The United States recently filed a criminal complaint against the chair of Harvard University’s chemistry department, Charles Lieber, alleging that he made materially false and fraudulent statements to the Department of Defense and National Institutes of Health regarding his role as “Strategic Scientist” at China’s Wuhan University of Technology and his participation in China’s Thousand Talents Plan.

contentpilot/introduction

The government alleges that Lieber, a Harvard professor since 1991, was paid $50,000 per month in salary and $150,000 per year in living expenses between 2012 and 2017 by the Thousand Talents Plan, in addition to a lump sum payment of nearly $1.5 million to establish a research lab at the Wuhan University of Technology. The Thousand Talents Plan is part of a Chinese government program to attract and recruit high-level scientific talent to China. The United States alleges that the Chinese government designed the Thousand Talents Plan to facilitate the transmission of U.S. knowledge and research to China in exchange for salaries, research funding and other incentives. Receipt of foreign funding is not unlawful, but it must be disclosed by a person who applies for any funding supported by U.S. taxpayers. The government alleges that Lieber failed to disclose that he received funding from the Chinese government.

core/paragraph

The criminal charges against Lieber are part of a larger effort over the past 18 months to criminally target forced intellectual property transfer, i.e., the dissemination of trade secrets, outside the United States. In announcing the charges against Lieber, the FBI stated that it is now investigating cases involving China in all 50 states. Last year, the Justice Department launched an investigation of multiple researchers at the University of Texas’s MD Anderson Cancer Center. No charges have been filed. According to media reports, investigations are ongoing at 71 institutions around the United States involving 180 individuals who are suspected of improperly transferring intellectual property outside the United States. The government, however, has not always been able to prove its allegations; in at least four instances since 2014, it has brought charges against scientists alleging theft of trade secrets, only to later dismiss those charges.

Although many of the government’s allegations implicate foreign nationals, American-born scientists are also under scrutiny, as the charges against Lieber demonstrate. Recently, the American-born CEO of the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida, resigned, along with the center’s director, after an internal investigation found their relationships with China violated conflict of interest rules. In response to these developments, the Association of American Universities and the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities have issued joint guidance to their member schools on steps they should take to protect intellectual property.

Although the most recent charges are directed at academic researchers, the United States has asserted that trade secret theft and forced technology transfers extend beyond academia into private industry. It is critical that companies have proper procedures in place to protect against trade secret theft and conflicts of interest. In addition to losing valuable intellectual property, a company and its employees may face criminal penalties and suffer reputational damage. The failure to disclose conflicts of interest, such as an employee accepting foreign funding, can result in a company’s debarment and a prohibition on receiving future U.S. government funding or government contracts.

How can academic institutions and research facilities respond to this growing problem? They can implement guidelines and procedures to combat the theft of trade secrets or other intellectual property:

core/list

core/heading

Joan Meyer 202.263.4115 312.998.4240 <a href="mailto:Joan.Meyer@ThompsonHine.com">Joan.Meyer@ThompsonHine.com</a>

Matthew David Ridings, CCEP 216.566.5561 <a href="mailto:Matt.Ridings@ThompsonHine.com">Matt.Ridings@ThompsonHine.com</a>

This advisory bulletin may be reproduced, in whole or in part, with the prior permission of Thompson Hine LLP and acknowledgment of its source and copyright. This publication is intended to inform clients about legal matters of current interest. It is not intended as legal advice. Readers should not act upon the information contained in it without professional counsel.

This document may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.

https://admin.thompsonhine.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/White_Collar_Update_-_U.S._Probes_Scientists_and_Academics_with_Overseas_Ties_Targets_Trade_Secret_Transfers.pdf

U.S. Probes Scientists and Academics with Overseas Ties, Targets Trade Secret Transfers

Services