Careers

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Experience

Innovation

Interactive Maps

Locations

About

Pages

Meet our team of innovators
Ask us how we do it

Professionals

Insights

Services

Thompson Hine LLP, a full-service business law firm with approximately 400 lawyers in 8 offices, was ranked number 1 in the category “Most innovative North American law firms: New working models” by The Financial Times and was 1 of 7 firms shortlisted for The American Lawyer’s inaugural Legal Services Innovation Award. The firm has been recognized by the National Law Journal as a Legal Technology Trailblazer and featured by Bloomberg for its innovative service delivery models, which drive accuracy and predictability. The firm’s commitment to innovation is embodied in Thompson Hine SmartPaTHTM – a smarter way to work – predictable, efficient and aligned with client goals. For more information, please visit ThompsonHine.com and ThompsonHine.com/SmartPaTH.

Home | Thompson Hine LLP

Atlanta

Chicago

Cincinnati

Cleveland

Columbus

Dayton

Los Angeles

Minneapolis

New York

Washington, D.C.

core/separator

core/heading

core/list

On March 18, 2020, the Delaware Supreme Court issued an en banc decision in Salzberg v. Sciabacucchi, upholding the use of federal forum provisions in corporate charters to require claims under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act") to be brought in federal court.

contentpilot/introduction

As the Delaware Supreme Court acknowledged, federal forum provisions "are a relatively recent phenomenon" that were designed to address certain "difficulties" that arose out of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, which held that federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over 1933 Act class-action claims and that such suits, when filed in state courts, are not removable to federal court.

core/paragraph

In the wake of Cyan, many plaintiffs’ lawyers saw an opportunity to sidestep the obstacles imposed by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (the "PSLRA") and began bringing state-court claims under the 1933 Act. In many cases, corporations found themselves defending against parallel state and federal-court actions, with no procedural mechanism available to consolidate or coordinate the suits.

To curb this trend, some Delaware corporations adopted charter provisions that required actions arising under the 1933 Act to be filed in federal court. Salzberg involved federal forum provisions adopted by three Delaware companies – Blue Apron Inc., Roku Inc., and Stitch Fix Inc. In a 2018 decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery invalidated these charter provisions, explaining that the "constitutive documents of a Delaware corporation cannot bind a plaintiff to a particular forum when the claim does not involve rights or relationships that were established by or under Delaware’s corporate law." The Delaware Supreme Court reversed this decision, holding that federal forum provisions are facially valid under Section 102(b)(1) of Delaware’s corporation law and consistent with the policy considerations underlying that statute.

By upholding the validity of federal forum provisions, the Delaware Supreme Court provided Delaware corporations with an important tool for avoiding the increased legal costs and risks of inconsistent rulings inherent in having to defend parallel state and federal 1933 Act claims, and to benefit from the protections of the PSLRA. Public companies, and those that aspire to become public in the future, may want to consider adding a federal forum provision to their corporate charters in light of this ruling.

Thomas M. Ritzert 216.566.5782 <a href="mailto:Thomas.Ritzert@ThompsonHine.com">Thomas.Ritzert@ThompsonHine.com</a>

Renee Zaytsev 212.908.3981 <a href="mailto:Renee.Zaytsev@ThompsonHine.com">Renee.Zaytsev@ThompsonHine.com</a>

Melanie M. Lazor 513.352.6554 <a href="mailto:Melanie.Lazor@ThompsonHine.com">Melanie.Lazor@ThompsonHine.com</a>

or any member of our <a href="https://www.thompsonhine.com/services/business-litigation">Business Litigation</a> practice group.

This advisory bulletin may be reproduced, in whole or in part, with the prior permission of Thompson Hine LLP and acknowledgment of its source and copyright. This publication is intended to inform clients about legal matters of current interest. It is not intended as legal advice. Readers should not act upon the information contained in it without professional counsel.

This document may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.

https://admin.thompsonhine.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Delaware_Supreme_Court_Upholds_Corporate_Charter_Provisions_Requiring_1933_Act_Claims_to_be_Filed_in_Federal_Court.pdf

Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Corporate Charter Provisions Requiring 1933 Act Claims to be Filed in Federal Court

Services