Careers

Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Experience

Innovation

Interactive Maps

Locations

About

Pages

Meet our team of innovators
Ask us how we do it

Professionals

Insights

Services

Thompson Hine LLP, a full-service business law firm with approximately 400 lawyers in 8 offices, was ranked number 1 in the category “Most innovative North American law firms: New working models” by The Financial Times and was 1 of 7 firms shortlisted for The American Lawyer’s inaugural Legal Services Innovation Award. The firm has been recognized by the National Law Journal as a Legal Technology Trailblazer and featured by Bloomberg for its innovative service delivery models, which drive accuracy and predictability. The firm’s commitment to innovation is embodied in Thompson Hine SmartPaTHTM – a smarter way to work – predictable, efficient and aligned with client goals. For more information, please visit ThompsonHine.com and ThompsonHine.com/SmartPaTH.

Home | Thompson Hine LLP

Atlanta

Chicago

Cincinnati

Cleveland

Columbus

Dayton

Los Angeles

Minneapolis

New York

Silicon Valley

Washington, D.C.

The Surface Transportation Board (STB) has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to repeal 49 C.F.R. Part 1144 (Intramodal Rail Competition). Part 1144 has constrained certain competitive access remedies – namely reciprocal switching, through routes, and through rate prescriptions – by requiring shippers to prove “anticompetitive conduct.” Repealing Part 1144 would restore the STB’s full statutory discretion to evaluate these remedies case by case under 49 U.S.C. §§ 10705 and 11102(c). Comments are due March 10; reply comments are due April 24.

contentpilot/introduction

core/heading

Under 49 U.S.C. §§ 10705 and 11102(c), the STB may order certain competitive access remedies to provide shippers with access to freight rail competition, including:

core/paragraph

Through routes and rates: A “through route” is a route for a shipment handled by two or more railroads. A “through rate” applies to the entire origin-to-destination movement and can be either a single “joint rate” or a combination of separate “proportional rates.”

core/list-item

Reciprocal switching: This remedy allows a shipper served by a single railroad at origin or destination to have its freight switched to a competing railroad in the terminal area for a fee that the incumbent railroad charges the competing railroad, creating a long-haul alternative to the incumbent.

core/list

Without these remedies, a “captive shipper” – a customer with access to only one railroad – must accept that railroad’s routing and pricing. The incumbent railroad can transport the captive shipper’s traffic over its own network, refuse to interchange traffic with a competing carrier that may offer better service, and charge for the entire movement, limited only by its statutory duty to set reasonable rates.

Part 1144 establishes a regulatory threshold for competitive access remedies that the governing statutes do not contain: proof of anticompetitive conduct by the incumbent carrier. Congress did not mandate this requirement; instead, it reflects an agency policy choice during a time of industry instability and resulted from a consensus among shipper and carrier groups that has since dissolved.

The NPRM would repeal Part 1144, removing the anticompetitive conduct threshold and related “standing” and evidentiary limits that narrowed the STB’s statutory discretion. The STB would then consider petitions case by case under 49 U.S.C. §§ 10705 and 11102(c), enabling a more flexible, fact-specific inquiry.

Impact on Shippers: Why the STB’s Proposed Repeal of Part 1144 Matters

For decades, shippers have argued that Part 1144’s anticompetitive conduct requirement creates an insurmountable barrier to obtaining competitive access remedies. The STB’s NPRM directly addresses this concern by proposing to eliminate this regulatory burden, opening a path for shippers to seek reciprocal switching or through routes under the plain statutory standards.

This shift could create new opportunities to preserve routing options, mitigate bottlenecks, and address service shortfalls without meeting an elevated evidentiary threshold. The STB anticipates that greater access to case-by-case adjudication could spur both STB-ordered relief and privately negotiated solutions, ultimately improving service and rates for shippers.

The STB invites written comments and reply comments on the proposed repeal. Comments are due by March 10 and reply comments are due by April 24.

Shipper comments are critical to building a strong record supporting the NPRM and countering expected opposition from Class I railroads. Shippers should consider filing comments that cover key points, such as:

Advocating for the repeal of the anticompetitive conduct requirement

Addressing whether the STB should fully repeal Part 1144 for both reciprocal switching and through routes

Identifying the benefits of a case-by-case adjudication approach

The NPRM signals a significant shift toward flexible, case-by-case remedies for competitive access – one that could materially improve shippers’ ability to obtain reciprocal switching or through routes. Shipper comments will be essential to shaping the final rule and ensuring these remedies are available to the full extent of the STB’s statutory authority.

core/separator

<em>This advisory bulletin may be reproduced, in whole or in part, with the prior permission of Thompson Hine LLP and acknowledgment of its source and copyright. This publication is intended to inform clients about legal matters of current interest. It is not intended as legal advice. Readers should not act upon the information contained in it without professional counsel.</em>

<em>This document may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions.</em>

https://admin.thompsonhine.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Transportation-Update-STB-Proposes-Repeal-of-Part-1144.pdf

STB Proposes Repeal of Part 1144, Eliminating Hurdles to Competitive Rail Access

Services