- Services
- Lawyers
- Locations
- News & Events
- Publications
- About
- Careers
May 7, 2008
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) won quick approval in the House of Representatives and the Senate in recent weeks and is expected to be signed into law shortly. In approving GINA, Congress recognized that although individuals may wish to gain genetic information to be warned of potential health problems, protections must be put in place to avoid misuse of that information for employment or health insurance purposes. GINA is intended to protect individuals from discrimination by employers, employment agencies, labor organizations and health insurers. GINA is far-reaching in that it amends or touches upon many laws including the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), the Public Health Service Act, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, Title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Specifically, GINA prohibits employers, employment agencies, labor organizations and joint labor-management committees from discriminating based on genetic information in the following circumstances:
GINA grants employees and individuals remedies similar to those provided under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other nondiscrimination laws and provides that no person shall retaliate against an individual for opposing an act or practice made unlawful by GINA.
GINA also addresses health insurance programs, including group plans, state-regulated plans, ERISA plans and those in the individual market. Specifically, group health plans and health insurance issuers may not:
In the individual health insurance market, insurers may not establish rules for eligibility, adjust premiums or contribution amounts for an individual, or impose preexisting condition exclusions based on genetic information. Insurers also may not request or require individuals or family members to undergo genetic testing.
While GINA is well-intentioned, it raises significant questions for employers and insurers. The definition of genetic information is very broad:
The breadth of the definition raises numerous questions. For example, an employee seeking time off to care for a family member under the Family and Medical Leave Act must provide certification of the family member's serious health condition in order to qualify for leave. This knowledge would qualify as "genetic information" under the statute's definition. Will employees be able to claim that subsequent disciplinary actions were founded on genetic information discrimination? Does the collection of family health history for a company-sponsored wellness program put the employer at risk for claims of a GINA violation? Hopefully, such questions will be clarified in the regulations that GINA requires various agencies to promulgate within a year of passage: the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (employment issues), the Department of Labor (ERISA issues), the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HIPAA and certain group health insurance issues) and the Secretary of Treasury (IRS issues). In any case, the statute is sure to generate litigation after it takes effect 18 months from the date that it is signed into law.IN GENERAL- The term "genetic information" means, with respect to any individual, information about -
(i) such individual's genetic tests,
(ii) the genetic tests of family members of such individual, and
(iii) the manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of such individual.
Please contact Staci M. Jenkins or any member of our Labor & Employment practice group for more information.
This advisory may be reproduced, in whole or in part, with the prior permission of Thompson Hine LLP and acknowledgement of its source and copyright. This publication is intended to inform clients about legal matters of current interest. It is not intended as legal advice. Readers should not act upon the information contained in it without professional counsel. This document may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Some of the design images and photographs in this document may be of actors depicting fictional scenes.
Last modified: May 7, 2008
Comments to: info@thompsonhine.com