- Services
- Lawyers
- Locations
- News & Events
- Publications
- About
- Careers
September 13, 2005
While Rule 38a-1 under the Investment Company Act requires a Board of Directors to approve the appointment, removal and compensation of a fund’s Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”), the rule is silent as to any requirement to annually review the performance of the CCO. However, Rule 38a-1 does require that a fund annually review the adequacy and effectiveness of its written compliance policies and procedures (“Compliance Program”), as well as the Compliance Program of each investment adviser, principal underwriter, administrator and transfer agent of the fund (“Fund Service Providers”). Because the CCO is an integral part of any Compliance Program, it is reasonable to expect a board to evaluate the effectiveness of a CCO as part of, or in connection with, the annual review of the Compliance Programs.1
The following statement by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) serves as a useful starting point for evaluating the effectiveness of a CCO:
“A fund’s chief compliance officer should be competent and knowledgeable regarding the federal securities laws and empowered with full responsibility and authority to develop and enforce appropriate policies and procedures for the fund.”2
Although this is a relatively vague standard, the SEC staff has informally articulated a number of specific qualities and capabilities that it believes a CCO should possess.3 In addition to analyzing these qualities and capabilities, a CCO’s effectiveness can be evaluated by reviewing the duties and functions actually performed by the CCO. This review should take into consideration the size, resources and business activities of the fund complex.
A fund CCO should have a good understanding of the federal securities laws and related regulations, SEC no-action letters, SEC policy and interpretive statements, and any other laws and regulations impacting investment company operations and regulation. Consideration of these factors will assist a board in evaluating whether the CCO has the knowledge and background to effectively administer the fund’s Compliance Program.
A fund CCO should keep abreast of changes in
regulatory requirements applicable to investment companies and their activities.
A board evaluating this factor should inquire as to
whether the
CCO:
A fund CCO should understand the compliance requirements applicable to investment companies and appreciate how effective Compliance Programs address and prevent violations of those requirements. This capability includes a familiarity with the steps required to create an effective compliance program, including the identification and assessment of risk, the creation of policies and procedures to address specific identified risks and the effective implementation of these policies and procedures. A CCO should be able to demonstrate that he or she:
A fund CCO should be able to determine the appropriate level of resources necessary to implement and maintain an effective Compliance Program and to request the resources necessary to carry out compliance activities. The board should determine whether the CCO:
A fund CCO should actively monitor the implementation of the Compliance Program by managers and others throughout the fund complex. An effective CCO will:
A fund CCO should be familiar with the fund’s business model, distribution channels, shareholder base, vendor relationships, and investment strategy. Knowledge of the fund’s business will help the CCO identify risks and gaps in the Compliance Program. An effective CCO will:
A fund CCO should be pro-active, inquisitive and have the ability to exercise professional skepticism. A board should attempt to determine whether the CCO:
A fund CCO should have sufficient authority within the fund complex to compel others to adhere to the firm’s compliance policies and procedures. A fund CCO will, of course, report directly to the Board of Trustees. A fund CCO, however, also may be an employee of the fund’s adviser or administrator. These CCOs should be a member of senior management and generally should report to the Chief Executive Officer (or an equivalent position) of the adviser or administrator. A board can determine whether a CCO has sufficient stature within an organization by evaluating:
The factors discussed in this bulletin will provide a Board of Directors with an outline for evaluating the effectiveness of a fund’s CCO. These same factors, with some modifications, also can be used by senior management of an investment adviser to evaluate the effectiveness of the adviser’s CCO under Rule 206(4)-7 under the Investment Advisers Act.
1. Many fund CCOs also serve as employees of a fund’s
adviser or administrator. These organizations generally evaluate employees and
determine compensation (i.e., salary, bonuses, stock options, etc.) on an annual
basis. Under Rule 38a-1, a board is required to approve any change in a CCO’s
compensation, even when the compensation is paid by a third party. This process,
which may not occur in connection with the annual review of the Compliance
Programs, presents the board with an additional opportunity to evaluate the
effectiveness of the CCO.
2. See Compliance Programs for Investment Companies and Investment Advisers, Release Nos. IA-2204; IC-26299 (February
2005) at p.11.
3. See Speech by SEC Staff: Managed Funds Association
Educational Seminar Series 2005: Practical Guidance for Hedge Fund CCOs Under
the SEC's New Regulatory Framework – A Job Description for CCOs to Private
Investment Funds, by Gene Gohlke, Associate Director,
Office of Compliance Inspection and Examinations, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, May 5, 2005.
Please contact Donald S. Mendelsohn, JoAnn M. Strasser, or Michael V. Wible or any member of our Corporate Transactions & Securities practice group for more information.
This advisory may be reproduced, in whole or in part, with the prior permission of Thompson Hine LLP and acknowledgement of its source and copyright. This publication is intended to inform clients about legal matters of current interest. It is not intended as legal advice. Readers should not act upon the information contained in it without professional counsel. This document may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Some of the design images and photographs in this document may be of actors depicting fictional scenes.
Last modified: July 16, 2008
Comments to: info@thompsonhine.com